Electrochemical studies of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid at a <scp>dl</scp>-norvaline-deposited glassy carbon electrode
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical behavior of ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA), and uric acid (UA) on a dl-norvaline-modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was studied by cyclic voltammetry. The bare GCE failed to distinguish the oxidation peaks of AA, DA, and UA in phosphate-buffered solution (pH 5.0), while the dl-norvaline-modified GCE could separate them efficiently. In differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) measurements, the modified electrode resolved the overlapped voltammetric responses of AA, DA, and UA into three well-defined voltammetric peaks. Under optimum conditions, the anodic peak currents of DPV for AA, DA, and UA were proportional to the concentration in the range of 20–400, 1–40, and 15–180 μmol/L, respectively, with a correlation coefficient (r) of around 0.998. The detection limits were 5, 0.3, and 10 μmol/L (S/N = 3) for AA, DA, and UA, respectively. Satisfactory results were achieved for the determination of AA in vitamin C tablets, DA in a dopamine ampoule sample, and UA in human blood serum samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".