Bibliographic record
Abstract
With nearly 80% of childhood cancer patients achieving cure, there are more adult survivors living now than at any other time in history. Because they are at risk for developing complications of treatment years later, it is recommended that survivors undergo systematic, regular monitoring into young adulthood and beyond. Occasionally, older adolescents and young adults are diagnosed with a relapsed, secondary or primary malignancy that requires urgent care. How best to manage each of these situations is a major challenge. A review of literature and clinical experience was performed. The medical, developmental, and psychosocial characteristics of older adolescents and young adults argue for a planned transition of care from a pediatric to more appropriate adult setting at that age. The 'health-oriented transition' involves the relatively healthy survivor, where an adult-oriented provider must be identified and supplied with a comprehensive treatment history, problem list, and monitoring plan. Continuity of medical insurance coverage must be preserved. The 2 basic models for this type of transition are either institution- or community-based. Each has relative advantages and disadvantages. In both, education and empowerment of the survivor are fundamental. The 'crisis-oriented transition' involves the older adolescent or young adult who is diagnosed in the pediatric setting with relapsed, secondary or primary cancer and is rapidly moved into the adult setting to begin treatment. With minimal time for preparation, this transition requires collaborative efforts by the pediatric and adult oncology teams. Having the capability to address both types of transition should be a central goal of any pediatric and adolescent oncology program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".