MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1909039063 · doi:10.1186/2050-5736-3-s1-p20

Mouse positioning device for blood brain barrier FUS exposure

2015· article· en· W1909039063 on OpenAlexaff
Shawn Gong, Bruno Adamczyk, Cleiton Dos Santos, Thiabault Estrade, Laura Curiel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Therapeutic Ultrasound · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Research Institute
FundersFocused Ultrasound Foundation
KeywordsEnzyme replacement therapyMedicineGlucocerebrosideBlood–brain barrierGaucher's diseasePositron emission tomographyGlucocerebrosidaseEnzymeDiseaseCentral nervous systemPathologyInternal medicineRadiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaucher’s disease is an inherited metabolic disorder that results in a deficiency of the enzyme glucocerebrosidase, which acts on the glycolipid glucocerebroside. This causes a rapid accumulation of glucocerebroside in affected persons, which manifests in organ malfunctions and disfiguration, swelling, and severe neurologic complications, among other symptoms. Enzyme replacement therapy can manage the symptoms but when the brain is affected, the treatment is not effective since the enzymes cannot cross the blood brain barrier (BBB). Imaging of enzyme replacement therapy has shown that only insignificant amounts reach the brain.[1] In this work, we intend to evaluate brain uptake of enzyme replacement after BBB opening mediated by focused ultrasound (FUS) to validate this delivery technique for the treatment of neurologic complications caused by Gaucher’s disease. Our goal is to develop a system for Blood Brain Barrier delivery that can be followed up using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. It will then be used to create and validate the delivery after intravenous injection of radiolabelled enzymes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Therapeutic UltrasoundSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207