MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1909056969

Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers' Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends

2006· article· en· W1909056969 on OpenAlexaff
Chidi Oguamanam

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Property and Patents
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRIPS architectureIntellectual propertyPolitical scienceConvention on Biological DiversityTraditional knowledgeLaw and economicsIndigenousSociologyLawBiodiversity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recognizing the transitions that have occurred in the global intellectual property arena since the TRIPS Agreement, this article identifies and examines key sites of the counter regime trends in intellectual property rights with a focus on farmers’ rights. It invokes farmers’ rights to highlight the conceptual and juridical hurdles facing the new issue-linkages that propel attempts to redress the shortcomings of the TRIPS’ trade-centered approach to intellectual property. The author argues that the existing juridical framework for farmers’ rights, especially under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), although inchoate, is stymied and not competent to realize the expectations underlying those rights. The notion of farmers’ rights would be better promoted under the canopy of the more unifying framework of other post-TRIPS counter-regime trends, especially the protection of the bio-cultural knowledge of indigenous and local communities, pursuant to the framework Convention on Biological Diversity. Reconnaissant les changements qui se sont produits sur la scene mondiale en matiere de propriete intellectuelle depuis la signature de l'Accord sue les aspects des droits de propriete intellectuelle qui touchent au commerce (Accord sur les ADPIC), l'article definit et examine des points cles des tendances contradictoires relativement aux droits de propriete intellectuelle, s'arretant particulierement aux droits des agriculteurs. Il parle des droits des agriculteurs pour illustrer les questions conceptuelles et juridiques qu'il faut resoudre pour combler les lacunes de l'approche de la propriete intellectuelle preconisee par l'Accord sur les ADPIC, soit une approche axee sur le commerce. L'auteur allegue que le cadre juridique actuel des droits des agriculteurs, en particulier sous le regime u Traite international sur les ressources phytogenetiques pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture, meme si le cadre est imparfait, est contrecarre et ne permet pas de realiser les attentes soulevees par ces droits. La notion de droits des agriculteurs serait mieux defendue a l'interieur du cadre plus unificateur d'autres tendances qui ont emerge a la suite de la conclusion de l'Accord, en particulier la protection des connaissances traditionnelles des collectivites autochtones et locales dans les domaines de la biologie et de la culture, dans le cadre Convention sur la diversite biologique. (Cet article est seulement disponible en anglais.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicIntellectual Property and PatentsFrench-language works237,207