Aromatic PMOs: tolyl, xylyl and dimethoxyphenyl groups integrated within the channel walls of hexagonal mesoporous silicas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There exists a need to synthesize PMOs with bridging organic groups beyond the few that are accessible from commercially available bis(triethoxysilyl)organic precursors. To fulfill this need, three new periodic mesoporous arylsilicas, aromatic PMOs, having bridging aromatic organic groups as an integral part of the framework have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The surfactant-templated synthesis employed new precursors consisting of two triethoxysilyl groups connected via toluene, p-xylene or 1,4-dimethoxybenzene. Diffraction and microscopy together with 13C CP-MAS NMR, 29Si MAS NMR and FT-Raman/IR measurements proved that the aryl–silica bonds in the new precursors and aromatic PMOs are stable under hydrolytic polycondensation self-assembly and surfactant acid extraction conditions. These PMOs have an ordered hexagonal channel mesostructure, some degree of ordering of aromatic groups likely through π–π stacking in the channel walls, a large pore volume and surface area, and relatively thick arylsilica walls whose dimensions seem to scale with the spatial demands of the aryl group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it