Worse blood pressure control in patients with cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease compared with coronary artery disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Mechtouff L, Touzé E, Steg PG, Ohman EM, Goto S, Hirsch AT, Röther J, Aichner FT, Weimar C, Bhatt DL, Alberts MJ, Mas J‐L, on behalf of the REACH Registry Investigators (Paris‐Descartes University; Université Paris 7; Paris, France, Duke University, Durham NC, USA, Tokai University, Isehara, Japan, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Academic Teaching Hospital Hannover Medical School, Minden, Germany, Academic Teaching Hospital Wagner‐Jauregg, Linz, Austria, University of Duisburg‐Essen, Essen, Germany, VA Boston Healthcare System, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; and Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL; USA). Worse blood pressure control in patients with cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease compared with coronary artery disease. J Intern Med 2010; 267 :621–633. Objectives. Poor blood pressure (BP) control is common amongst patients with symptomatic atherothrombotic disease. It is unclear whether BP control and management differ across atherothrombotic disease subtypes. Methods. We analysed the baseline data of 44 984 patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD) only ( n = 30 414), cerebrovascular disease (CVD) only ( n = 11 359) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) only ( n = 3211) from the international REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry and investigated the impact of atherothrombotic disease subtype on BP control and use of antihypertensive drugs. Results. The proportion of patients with BP controlled (<140/90 mmHg) was higher in CAD (58.1%) than in CVD (44.8%) or PAD (38.9%) patients ( P < 0.001). Amongst patients with treated hypertension, CAD patients were more likely to have BP controlled than were CVD patients [odds ratio (OR) = 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.59–1.75] or PAD (OR = 2.30; 95% CI = 2.10–2.52). These differences were smaller in women than in men and decreased with age. Amongst treated patients, CAD patients were more likely to receive ≥3‐drug combination therapies than were CVD (OR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.64–1.83) or PAD (OR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.49–1.80) patients. Adjustment for age, gender, waist obesity, diabetes, education level and world region did not alter the results. Conclusions. Coronary artery disease patients are more likely than CVD or PAD patients to have BP controlled and to receive antihypertensive drugs, particularly combination therapies. Promotion of more effective BP control through combination antihypertensive therapies could improve secondary prevention and therefore prevent complications in CVD and PAD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".