MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1910670615 · doi:10.1029/2006gc001473

Hf isotope compositions of U.S. Geological Survey reference materials

2007· article· en· W1910670615 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFelsicBorosilicate glassGeologyRadiogenic nuclideTrace elementAndesiteBasaltIsotopeGeochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MineralogyZirconMaficEnvironmental chemistryChemistryVolcanic rockPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A systematic multi‐isotopic and trace element characterization of U.S. Geological Survey reference materials has been carried out at the Pacific Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, University of British Columbia. Values of 176 Hf/ 177 Hf are recommended for the following reference materials (mean ±2 SD): G‐2: 0.282523 ± 6; G‐3: 0.282518 ± 1; GSP‐2: 0.281949 ± 8; RGM‐1: 0.283017 ± 13; STM‐1: 0.283019 ± 12; STM‐2: 0.283021 ± 5; BCR‐1: 0.282875 ± 8; BCR‐2: 0.282870 ± 8; BHVO‐1: 0.283106 ± 12; BHVO‐2: 0.283105 ± 11; AGV‐1: 0.282979 ± 6; and AGV‐2: 0.282984 ± 9. Reproducibility is better than 50 ppm for the granitoid compositions and better than 40 ppm for the basaltic/andesitic compositions. For the isotopic analyses acquired early in this project on glass columns, Hf isotopic analyses from several of the reference materials were significantly less reproducible than Nd and Sr isotopic analyses determined from the same sample dissolution. The 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios for relatively radiogenic compositions (BCR‐1, 2; BHVO‐1, 2; RGM‐1) were shifted systematically toward lower values by 100–150 ppm when a borosilicate primary column was used. Although systematic, the shift for felsic compositions was generally within analytical error, except for GSP‐2, which has a very low Hf isotopic ratio, where the shift was to higher 176 Hf/ 177 Hf. Trace element and isotopic characterization of the borosilicate glass column, borosilicate frits, and quartz columns reveals extremely variable levels of trace elements. The 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios for these materials are very unradiogenic (borosilicate glass <0.28220; frit = 0.28193 ± 4). The borosilicate frit material appears to be the most variable in elemental concentration and isotopic composition. The quartz material has very low levels (<ppm) of all trace elements. Low 176 Hf/ 177 Hf and high Hf concentrations of the borosilicate glass column (16 ppm) and frit material (22 ppm) indicate that only small amounts of such unradiogenic material could cause significant contamination of small samples. For the basaltic (BCR‐1, 2; BHVO‐1, 2) and rhyolitic (RGM‐1) samples, approximately 3 ng of Hf from the column or frit would be enough to produce the observed 100–150 ppm shift. Accurate, high‐precision 176 Hf/ 177 Hf data can only be acquired if samples are processed using all PTFE Teflon® labware, or quartz and polypropylene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it