MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1910918320 · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-4434

Testosterone Replacement in Androgen-Deficient Men With Ejaculatory Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2015· article· en· W1910918320 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsPlaceboEjaculationSexual functionTestosterone (patch)MedicineErectile dysfunctionAndrogen deficiencySexual dysfunctionInternal medicineUrologyRandomized controlled trialSexual desirePremature ejaculationAdverse effectGynecologyAndrogenPsychologyHuman sexualityHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Low T levels have been associated with ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) in cross-sectional studies; however, the efficacy of T replacement in improving EjD has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of T replacement in androgen-deficient men with EjD. DESIGN: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 16-week trial with T solution 2% versus placebo. SETTING: Medical centers in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-six men with one or more EjD symptoms, including delayed ejaculation, anejaculation, reduced ejaculate volume, and/or reduced force of ejaculation, and two total T levels <300 ng/dL (<10.41 nmol/L) measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. INTERVENTIONS: Sixty milligrams of T solution 2% or placebo applied to the axillae for 16 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a change in the score of the three-item Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction-Short Form (MSHQ-EjD-SF); secondary outcomes included measured ejaculate volume, scores of the bother/satisfaction item of the MSHQ-EjD-SF, the orgasmic function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire, and the sexual activity log. RESULTS: Seventy-six participants were randomized; 66 completed the study. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the treatment arms. T replacement improved the MSHQ-EjD-SF score (mean score change, +3.1); however, this effect was not statistically different from placebo (mean score change, +2.5; P = .596). No differences were seen in any of the secondary outcomes or frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSION: T replacement was not associated with significant improvement in EjD in androgen-deficient men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it