MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W191126639 · doi:10.4000/leportique.2433

« C’est en écrivant qu’on devient écrevisse ».

2009· article· fr· W191126639 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Portique · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vendredi aprs-midi dans l'univers, dans toutes les directions dedans & dehors [] Sois gentil avec le crabe monstrueux, il n'est qu'un arrangement de ce que tu es toi. Jack Kerouac 1 1 Que l'on pense la chouette de Minerve, la mchoire de serpent qui servit de modle Talos, neveu de Ddale, pour inventer la scie, aux souris, aux chiens et au poulpe de Diogne, ou bien aux abeilles d'Aristote ; que l'on pense, plus tardivement, aux animaux-machines de Descartes (mme sur un autre registre) ou aux araignes de Spinoza, l'lphant de Kant et aux vaches noires de Hegel, au butor toil de Kierkegaard, la vache multicolore ou au cheval maltrait chez Nietzsche, la licorne de Wittgenstein, au chat de Schrdinger, ou encore l'alouette de Heidegger, etc. La mythologie, la science et la philosophie n'ont jamais cess, en effet, de se peupler d'animaux qui, s'ils ne passent inaperus, semblent cependant ne leur tenir lieu que de simples accessoires -animaux subsidiaires ou surnumraires dont l'utilit intuitive ou la ncessit n'est souvent plus au got du jour. Bref, ces exemples s'affichent aujourd'hui comme des images d'pinal ; autrement dit, comme celles d'un bestiaire philosophique, mais o l'on ne sait plus, parfois, qui du philosophe, ou de l'animal, vraiment, fait la bte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it