MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1912170147 · doi:10.1111/jvs.12320

Does drought incite tree decline and death in <i>Austrocedrus chilensis</i> forests?

2015· article· en· W1912170147 on OpenAlex
Mariano M. Amoroso, Lori D. Daniels, Ricardo Villalba, Paolo Cherubini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vegetation Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsEcologyDendrochronologyCanopyGeographyClimate changeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Questions Is mal del ciprés , the widespread decline and death of Austrocedrus chilensis trees, caused by a single pathogen or multiple factors? Using a novel dendrochronological approach, we disentangled the influences of climatic variation on the radial growth decline and death of A. chilensis trees in declining forests. We distinguish possible causes of reduced radial growth and mortality from autogenic processes driven by stand development. We present a conceptual model of forest decline including multiple factors that predispose, incite and contributed to decreased radial growth and death of A. chilensis . Location A. chilensis forests on mesic sites in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Methods We used dendrochronology to determine the years of (1) onset of radial growth decline of 301 living and dead trees stratified by canopy position at decline onset, and (2) mortality of 339 trees stratified by radial growth patterns and canopy position at death. Events were years with low or high numbers of trees initiating decline or dying. We tested the hypothesis that onset of decline and mortality were concurrent with drought for individual trees, using contingency tables, and for events, using superposed epoch analysis. Results Climatic variability acts as an environmental stress inciting and contributing to stand‐level forest decline. The onset of radial growth decline and mortality of individual trees were significantly associated with summer moisture deficits. High‐magnitude onset‐of‐decline and mortality events were concurrent with adverse climatic conditions. Conclusions Climatic variation and drought incite and contribute to tree‐ and stand‐level decline and mortality in A. chilensis forests. Deciphering the effects of stand development is critical as autogenic processes independently drive tree mortality and mediate the effects of climatic variability on A. chilensis forest decline. Based on our results, we present a conceptual model within the framework of a forest decline process, and conclude A. chilensis mortality is a forest decline process driven by complex interactions between allogenic abiotic and biotic factors and autogenic stand development processes. Site conditions, genetic variation and sex of trees are predisposing factors that likely interact with the pathogen Phytophthora .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it