MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1912666034 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tp35

Abstract T P35: Baseline Diffusion Weighted Imaging Lesion Volume Predicts Disappearance of Infarct on Fluid Attenuated Inverse Recovery Sequences Within 30 Days of TIA/Minor Stroke

2014· article· en· W1912666034 on OpenAlexaff
Parnian Riaz, Mahesh Kate, Leka Sivakumar, Derek Emery, Kenneth Butcher

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryMedicineStroke (engine)InfarctionMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineDiffusion MRILesionMinor strokeEffective diffusion coefficientCentral nervous system diseaseRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicinePathologyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Evidence of infarction on MRI is predictive of early stroke recurrence after TIA/minor stroke. It has recently been reported that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) changes are not associated with evidence of infarction on Fluid Attenuated Inverse Recovery (FLAIR) sequences 90 days later in 30% of patients. We completed a serial MRI study to determine the time course of infarct resolution. We tested the hypothesis that acute DWI lesion volume predicts infarct disappearance by 30 days. Methods: Acute TIA/minor stroke patients (NIHSS≤3) were prospectively imaged at baseline, 7 and 30 days after symptom onset. Lesion volumes were measured planimetrically by a blinded rater at each time point on DWI and FLAIR sequences. Mean and relative (to contralateral tissue) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ((r)ADC) values were also calculated. Results: Acute DWI lesions were found in 94/172 patients. Median time between symptom onset and baseline MRI was 20.9(19.3) h. DWI volume decreased from baseline (1.51 ml (4.36)) at 7 days (1.13 ml (2.96), P =0.001) and at 30 days (0.40 ml (0.97), P <0.0001). DWI lesions at 7 days pseudo-normalized (infarct visible on FLAIR) in 3.4% and resolved without evidence of infarction in 8% of patients. Seventy-seven (82%) patients had persistent lesions on FLAIR at 30 days (FLAIR+). Baseline NIHSS scores were similar between FLAIR+ (1.40±1.21) and FLAIR– patients (1.18±1.19, P =0.64). Baseline rADC was similar in FLAIR+ (0.84(0.17)) and FLAIR– patients (0.89(0.21), P =0.155). Baseline DWI volumes were larger in FLAIR+ (2.08 ml (6.9)) than FLAIR– patients (0.69 ml (0.95), P =0.007). ROC analysis indicated that a baseline DWI volume <2.04 ml predicted absence of FLAIR lesion at 30 days with a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 50.6%. Good functional outcome (modified Rankin Score ≤2) at 90 days was similar in FLAIR+ (54/62, 87%) and FLAIR– patients (12/12, 100%, P =0.339). Conclusion: Acute DWI lesions are transient and not always associated with visible infarction on FLAIR, even as early as 7 days after symptom onset. Delaying MRI results in a failure to demonstrate evidence of infarction in the majority of patients, particularly those with DWI lesion volumes below 2 ml.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207