MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1913337 · doi:10.1139/m91-040

Parallel delaunay refinement mesh generation

2004· article· en· W1913337 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Omar Ghattas, Clemens Kadow

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDelaunay triangulationChew's second algorithmPolygon meshRuppert's algorithmBowyer–Watson algorithmComputer scienceConstrained Delaunay triangulationMesh generationAlgorithmDistributed memoryT-verticesPartition (number theory)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsParallel computingShared memoryComputer graphics (images)Finite element methodCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delaunay refinement has been established as an effective and efficient technique to generate high quality meshes for arbitrary domains. Starting from a constrained Delaunay triangulation of the input of points and line segments, Delaunay refinement adds carefully chosen Steiner points to the mesh while maintaining the constrained Delaunay property. This strategy results in theoretically sound algorithms that generate quality meshes of optimal small size. Sequential implementations of such algorithms are available and work very well in practice. As the meshing problem is time and memory intense large-scale problems call for the use of parallel computers. This thesis presents a parallel Delaunay refinement algorithm to solve the two-dimensional meshing problem on distributed memory computers. In contrast to other work, no assumptions on the size or the regularity of the input are made. Parallelizing Delaunay refinement is difficult as the underlying theory is intrinsically sequential. To approve a Steiner point for insertion a consistent view of the current state of the mesh in the neighborhood of the new point is needed. Inserting a Steiner point changes the mesh only locally but in an unstructured way, which makes it hard to maintain a partition of the mesh based upon mesh entities. The presented algorithm partitions the mesh based upon certain mesh properties and maintains this partition while the mesh is generated and refined. At first, the input is distributed over the parallel machine by means of projection-based dividers. Then local meshes are generated and refined in parallel. Properties of the projection-based dividers are exploited to achieve a very high level of asynchronicity. This thesis first reviews sequential Delaunay refinement algorithms and extends them to work on constrained Delaunay meshes. In the second part the parallel Delaunay refinement algorithm is introduced and described in detail. Correctness and optimality of the new algorithm are proved before illustrative examples are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207