MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1913340859 · doi:10.5539/jmsr.v5n1p12

Two Challenges to the System of Periclase Quality Evaluation

2015· article· en· W1913340859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Science Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPericlaseMaterials scienceHomogeneousMineralogyQuality (philosophy)Process engineeringMetallurgyThermodynamicsGeologyPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p class="1Body">A new method of estimating the fused periclase quality – the revision of international standards. Quality and service life of refractories on the basis of fused periclase depend to a large extent upon the size of periclase crystals and its mineralogical composition. During fusion of periclase it is impossible to obtain completely homogeneous material with identical crystals size. That is why it is generally accepted to evaluate quality of fused periclase by the average crystals size. Measurements of this item are usually done with the help of generally adopted method of chords, which was developed in the last century and has a number of drawbacks. Magnezit Group developed a new objective method of digital analysis during microscopic examination of structural elements of fused periclase. It allows to considerably improve objectivity of obtained data. The main feature of the new method is application of the system of images analysis, which allows to carry out in automatic mode measurements on the preliminary created digital model of the whole area of the polished section. With the help of the digital model it is possible to calculate average size of fused periclase crystals taking into account number of crystals as well as percentage of the area occupied by them.</p> <p class="1Body">Does CaO/SiO<sub>2</sub> ratio influence service life of refractories? New view of old rules. Till today it was considered that one of the characteristics of fused periclase quality is coefficient of basicity – CaO/SiO<sub>2</sub>, ratio, which should be more than 2. Magnezit Group carried out investigations of coarse-crystalline fused periclase with MgO >97.5 % content and with various CaO/SiO<sub>2 </sub>ratios. We present in this report the main study results: if the impurities content is low in the fused periclase with MgO >97.5 %, then coefficient of basicity exerts limited influence onto the service life of periclase-carbon bricks.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.427
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.040 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it