Testing children of mothers with HIV infection: experience in three south‐west London HIV clinics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There are several reported cases of vertically infected children presenting with advanced HIV infection in the UK. The children of women with HIV infection are at increased risk of being infected. There are few data available on the number of such children that are yet to be tested for HIV. This study looked at the HIV testing status of children whose mothers attend HIV services at three south-west London clinics. METHODS: Case notes of women attending the clinics from 1 January to 30 June 2009 were reviewed. When data were incomplete, women were prospectively interviewed. RESULTS: Case notes of 605 women were reviewed; 478 women had 1107 children. The majority of women (386; 81%) were of Black African ethnicity. Sixty-one per cent (675 of 1107) of the children were known to have been tested for HIV. The children resident abroad were more likely to be untested compared with those resident in the UK; 186 of 255 (73%) vs. 246 of 852 (29%). A quarter (106 of 432) of the untested children were ≤ 18 years old; 49 (46%) of these were resident in the UK. The most common reason given by the mothers for not testing was a perceived 'unlikely risk'. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of children at risk of vertically transmitted HIV infection, including 49 children ≤ 18 years and resident in the UK, were identified through this study. The mothers are being encouraged to have these children tested and a multidisciplinary team involving adult and paediatric HIV healthcare professionals has been set up to negotiate and facilitate testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".