MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Research on a Fast Delivery Production System: Just-in-time production system

2009· article· en· W1915522605 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caifeng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)HumanitiesComputer scienceProduction system (computer science)ArtEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we analyzed calling the age to product or service for consumer demand living in the word. We come to a conclusion that speed or time is the key factors for enterpriser for competing intensely. So, the paper proposes JIT system achieve the tasks. Later, we address thoroughly the meaning of Just-in-time production system from speed and time angles and present two goals ultimate goal and the supporting goals implementation successfully. According to goal, this paper analyzed that implementing JIT should be achieved requires and carry out approaches. At last, this paper provided that JIT contribute benefits and causes to problem. Nonetheless, JIT is a robust production system for manufacturer and consumer. Moreover, I believe that it advent and it will be a main stream of a fluid production system for the future. Key words: just-in-time production system; fast delivery; continue quality improvement; manufacturing cells Resume: Dans cette memoire, nous analysons la vocation de l’âge a produire ou a servir pour la vie de la demande consommatrice dans le monde. Nous venons a une conclusion que la vitesse ou le temps est les facteurs cles en faveur de l’entrepreneur dans le but de rivaliser profondement. Donc, la memoire propose le systeme JIT accomplit les tâches. Ensuite, nous adressons a fond le sens du systeme producteur JIT de la vitesse et les angles de temps et presentons deux buts, but ultime et l’implementation des buts soutenant successivement. D’apres le but, cette memoire analyse que l’implementation JIT doit etre accomplie les demandes et executer les propositions. Enfin, cette memoire fournit que le JIT contribue les avantages et les causes au probleme. Malgre tout, JIT est un systeme robuste producteur pour les fabricants et les consommateurs. En plus, je crois qu’il se realisera et sera un torrent d’un systeme producteur fluide pour l’avenir. Mots-Cles: Systeme producteur JIT ; livraison rapide ; amelioration qualitative continuelle; cellule fabricante

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207