MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1915832533 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001146

Early postnatal (<96 hours) corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

2003· review· en· W1915832533 on OpenAlexaff
Henry L. Halliday, RA Ehrenkranz, Lex W. Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetinopathy of prematurityBronchopulmonary dysplasiaPediatricsPeriventricular leukomalaciaNecrotizing enterocolitisIntraventricular hemorrhageDuctus arteriosusCerebral palsyPregnancyGestational ageInternal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung disease (CLD) remains a major problem in neonatal intensive care units. Persistent inflammation in the lungs is the most likely underlying pathogenesis. Corticosteroids have been used to either prevent or treat CLD because of their potent anti-inflammatory effects. OBJECTIVES: To determine if postnatal corticosteroid treatment is of benefit in the prevention of chronic lung disease (CLD) in the preterm infant. This review examines the outcome of trials where preterm infants at risk of CLD were given postnatal steroids within 96 hours after birth. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials of postnatal corticosteroid therapy were sought from the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, hand searching paediatric and perinatal journals, examining previous review articles and information received from practising neonatologists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of postnatal corticosteroid treatment within 96 hours of birth (early) in high risk preterm infants were selected for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, failure to extubate, pulmonary air leak, survival without chronic lung disease, CLD defined at 28 days postnatal age and 36 weeks post menstrual age, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leucomalacia (PVL), infection, hyperglycaemia, hypertension, severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation and long-term outcomes were abstracted and analysed using RevMan 4.1. MAIN RESULTS: Nineteen randomised controlled trials of early postnatal corticosteroid treatment of preterm babies at risk of developing CLD were identified. A meta-analysis of these trials demonstrates benefits as regards earlier extubation, decreased risks of CLD at both 28 days and 36 weeks, death or CLD at 28 days, PDA and pulmonary air leak. There were no differences in the rates of neonatal mortality, infection, severe ROP, severe IVH, PVL, NEC and pulmonary haemorrhage. Gastrointestinal bleeding and intestinal perforation were important adverse effects and the risks of hyperglycaemia and hypertension were also increased. In the two trials which have reported late outcomes, several adverse neurological effects were found at follow-up examinations of survivors treated with early steroids: abnormal neurological examination, cerebral palsy and developmental delay. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of early postnatal corticosteroid treatment (< 96 hours) may not outweigh the known or potential adverse effects of this treatment. Adverse gastrointestinal effects early in the neonatal period and adverse neurological outcomes seen at follow-up mean that current use of early postnatal steroids needs to be reconsidered. There is a compelling need for the long term follow-up and reporting of late outcomes, especially neurological and developmental outcomes, among surviving infants who participated in all randomised trials of early postnatal corticosteroid treatment. The role of inhaled steroids remains to be elucidated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations303
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsFrench-language works237,207