MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1916348838 · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6918

Influence of low‐molecular‐weight glutenin subunit genes at <i>Glu‐<scp>A3</scp></i> locus on wheat sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume and solvent retention capacity value

2014· article· en· W1916348838 on OpenAlexaff
Zhixia Li, Hongqi Si, Yunxiang Xia, Chuanxi Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
KeywordsGluteninLocus (genetics)ChemistrySucroseSodium dodecyl sulfateChromatographyBiochemistryFood scienceProtein subunitGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: To understand the effect of low-molecular-weight (LMW) glutenin alleles at the Glu-A3 locus on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sedimentation volume and solvent retention capacity (SRC) values, 244 accessions of Chinese wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mini core collections were investigated. In this study the significant differences in wholemeal flour SDS sedimentation volume and SRC values associated with specific glutenin alleles at the Glu-A3 locus were explained. RESULTS: Seven glutenin alleles at the Glu-A3 locus were confirmed by locus-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). SDS sedimentation volume and lactic acid SRC value were significantly affected by alleles Glu-A3b and Glu-A3g. Based on total average values, 28 varieties carrying Glu-A3b had significantly higher means of SDS sedimentation volume and lactic acid SRC value, whereas 19 varieties carrying Glu-A3g had significantly lower means. Alleles Glu-A3d and Glu-A3f significantly increased only SDS sedimentation volume and sucrose SRC value respectively. Correlation analysis showed that SDS sedimentation volume was uncorrelated with lactic acid SRC and sucrose SRC values. CONCLUSION: The Glu-A3 LMW glutenin subunit could predict 12.8% of the variance in SDS sedimentation volume, 4.7% in lactic acid SRC and 6.4% in sucrose SRC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Science of Food and AgricultureSame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207