MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Kallikrein‐related peptidase 4, matrix metalloproteinase 20, and the maturation of murine and porcine enamel

2011· article· en· W1916466879 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanyuan Hu, Jan C.‐C. Hu, Charles E. Smith, John D. Bartlett, James P. Simmer

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal Of Oral Sciences · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityNational Institutes of HealthMichigan State UniversityUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsEnamel paintAmeloblastChemistryAmelogeninAmelogenesisAnatomyBiophysicsPathologyDentistryBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crowns of matrix metalloproteinase 20 (Mmp20) null mice fracture at the dentino-enamel junction (DEJ), whereas the crowns of kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (Klk4) null mice fracture in the deep enamel just above the DEJ. We used backscatter scanning electron microscopy to assess enamel mineralization in incisors from 9-wk-old wild-type, Klk4 null, and Mmp20 null mice, and in developing pig molars. We observed a line of hypermineralization along the DEJ in developing wild-type mouse and pig teeth. This line was discernible from the early secretory stage until the enamel in the maturation stage reached a similar density. The line was apparent in Klk4 null mice, but absent in Mmp20 null mice. Enamel in the Klk4 null mice matured normally at the surface, but was progressively less mineralized with depth. Enamel in the Mmp20 null mice formed as a mineral bilayer, with neither layer looking like true enamel. The most superficial mineral layer expanded during the maturation stage and formed irregular surface nodules. A surprising finding was the observation of electron backscatter from mid-maturation wild-type ameloblasts, which we attributed to the accumulation and release of iron. We conclude that enamel breaks in the deep enamel of Klk4 null mice because of decreasing enamel maturation with depth, and at the DEJ in Mmp20 null mice because of hypomineralization at the DEJ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal Of Oral SciencesSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207