MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1916503578

퀘벡정당(Bloc Quebecois)의 등장과 캐나다 정당체계의 변화

2006· article· ko· W1916503578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
박재정

Bibliographic record

Venue정치정보연구 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceLinguisticsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1993년 캐나다연방선거는 오랫동안 계속된 카르텔정당체계의 해체를 의미하였다. 캐나다정치체계의 반협의체적 성격에도 불구하고 정당체계는 오랫동안 단일균열구조의 양당 또는 2.5당체계에 의하여 운영되어 왔다. 1992년 퀘벡정당의 출범은 이러한 보수 대 진보라는 산업사회적 균열구조에 후기산업사회적 균열구조가 중첩됨과 동시에 지역주의와 보편주의라는 전통적인 균열구조를 재등장시킴으로써 캐나다정당체계를 근본적으로 뒤흔든 잊을 수 없는 선거였다. 퀘벡주 내의 주정치에만 관여하던 퀘벡당이 퀘벡정당의 이름으로 연방정치에 등장하면서 연방정당체계는 다차원의 균열구조가 자리잡게 되었다. 퀘벡정당은 지역주의와 자유해방주의가 결합됨으로써 폭발력을 가지게 되었으며, 퀘벡정당의 자유해방주의적 성격은 퀘벡정당에 대항하여 서부지역을 기반으로 성공한 개혁당의 민중주의적 신우파의 성격에서도 확인된다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue정치정보연구Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207