Beyond gastrointestinal graft‐versus‐host disease. A lesson to learn
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gassas A, Zaidman I, Schechter T, Doyle J. Beyond gastrointestinal graft‐versus‐host disease. A lesson to learn. Pediatr Transplantation 2011: 15: E139–E141. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The authors present a child with severe GvHD of GI tract with typical presentation of ileus and abdominal pain. However, the severe GvHD has led to multiple intermittent intussusceptions with resultant ischemic segments of the small bowel leading to sub‐acute mechanical intestinal obstruction. The clinical presentation of the mechanical intestinal obstruction was identical to the preceding ileus GvHD presentation. This has led to continuation of the conservative management with immunosuppressant therapy and delaying further investigation and surgical intervention. Once a barium study demonstrated the severe bowel constriction, laparoscopic surgical resection was necessary with excellent results. The resected small bowel showed multiple segments of ischemic ileitis leading to ulceration and severe stricture. The resection margins showed regenerating mucosa with no ulceration, but with focal evidence of mild GvHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".