MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1916799049 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1994.411702

Sampled-data GPC (SDGPC) with integral action: the state space approach

2002· article· en· W1916799049 on OpenAlexaff
Ge Lu, Guy A. Dumont

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiecewiseConstant (computer programming)SetpointLaguerre polynomialsStability (learning theory)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)State spaceController (irrigation)State (computer science)Action (physics)MathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a sampled-data generalized predictive control (SDGPC) algorithm is developed. SDGPC is based on a continuous-time state space model with continuous-time quadratic cost function, but the projected future control scenario is assumed to be piecewise constant. In doing so, SDGPC can be implemented digitally without any approximation. By state augmentation, SDGPC produces integral action to track a constant setpoint with zero steady error subject to an unknown constant disturbance. Laguerre filter modeling concepts which have been popular recently in process industry can be integrated into this controller design readily and the resulting sampled-data Laguerre-based GPC (SDLGPC) is suitable for adaptive applications. The closed-loop stability of SDGPC is established and the relation between SDGPC and the discrete-time approach is analyzed. Some simulation examples are presented to illustrate the properties of SDGPC.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207