A Cognitive-Pragmatic Model for Translation Studies Based on Relevance and Adaptation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current study makes an attempt to explore how Relevance affects the translator’s comprehension of the source text (ST) and how Adaptation bears on the choice-making in the reproduction of the source message in the target text (TT) from a cognitive pragmatic perspective. The primary objective is to construct a cognitive pragmatic-oriented model based on Verschueren’s Adaptation (2000:66 ) and Relevance Theory advanced by Sperber and Wilson (2000: 12) for the enhancement of harmony in translation, thus offering effective guidance for translation practice and a unified theoretical framework for a better understanding of pragmatics of human language in its socio-cultural contexts. The major hypothesis is that translation as a communicative activity consists of two dynamic processes---the decoding-inferential process and the encoding-choice-making process in which three parties (writer, translator and target reader) are involved and the work translated is the product of the interaction of the three parties’ cognitive environments. Taking into consideration all the three parties (writer, translator, target reader) involved in the communicative event of translation, the thesis holds the view that the translator’s cognitive environment plays a key role in successful communication between the writer and target reader. Based on a review of previous translation studies, this thesis argues that both of the Relevance-guided translation studies and the Adaptation-guided translation studies suffer from one-sidedness since the former is mainly concerned with the first dynamic process---interpretation of the ST while the latter with the second dynamic process--- production of the target text. They fail to pay sufficient attention to the interplay among the cognitive environments of the three participants. The emphasis on this interplay is due to the fact that translation concerns both ST interpretation and TT production. Negligence of either by the translator may lead to inadequate communication and even complete communication failure. To benefit from the previous studies and, at the same time, to overcome their one-sidedness, the thesis proposes a more comprehensive cognitive-pragmatic model for translation studies based on a combination of Relevance and Adaptation. Such a model sees translation in terms of multiple interactions in the two processes among the three parties who are different in cognition and cultural backgrounds. To prove the efficacy of this model, this thesis provides some authentic linguistic evidence collected from translation practice for illustration. Based on the linguistic evidence and illustration, the thesis arrives at the conclusion that the translator whose task is to produce a target language text that bears a close pragmatic resemblance to the source language text should be aware of the cognitive and cultural issues when translating because different cognitive environment and culture influence people’s way of using and comprehending language; the proposed cognitive-pragmatic model, approaching translation studies from a cognitive pragmatic perspective and emphasizing dynamic contextual analysis, represents only a tentative attempt at offering a more unified theoretical guidance for future translation practices. Key words: Pragmatics; Cognition; Relevance; Adaptation; Translation Studies Resume: Cette presente etude essaie d’explorer comment la pertinence affecte la comprehension de l’auteur sur le texte original et quel est le rapport entre l’adaptation et la prise de decision et de choix dans la reproductin du message original dans le texte objectif, a partir d’une perspective cognitive et pragmatique. L’objectif primaire est de constuire un model cognifif et pragmatique base sur L’Adaptation de Verschueren (2000:66 ) et sur La theorie avancee concernant la pertinence de Sperber et Wilson (2000: 12 ) pour assurer l’harmonie dans la traduction, donner une orientation effective pour les exercices de traduction et offrir un cadre theorique unifie pour une meilleur comprehension des langues humaines dans leur contexte socio-culturel. L’hypothese principale est de considerer la traduction comme une activite communicative qui consiste en deux prcessus dynamiques - le processus d’inference-decodee et le processus de prise de decision encodee dans le quel trios parties (l’auteur, le traducteur and les lecteurs cibles) sont impliquees et que l’oeuvre traduite est le produit de l’interaction des environnement cognitifs de ces trois parties. En prenant compte de ces trois parties (l’auteur, le traducteur and les lecteurs cibles) impliquees dans le cas communicatif de traduction, la these tient le point de vue que l’environnement cognitif du traducteur joue un role important dans une communication reussie entre l’auteur et les lecteurs cibles.Basee sur une revision des etudes anterieures en traduction, cette these affirme que les etudes guidees sur la pertinence et les etudes guidees sur l’adaptation souffrent de l’unilateralisme, car celles-la sont principalement concernees par le premier processus dynamiquel’interpretation du texte original, tandis que celles-ci par le second processus dynamique-production du texte objectif. Elles ne font pas suffisamment attention aux interactions entre les environnements cognitifs des trois parties. La raison de la mise en accentuation sur les interations est le fait que la traduction concerne l’interpretation du texte original et la production du texte objectif. La negligence du traducteur pour l’un d’ entre les deux pourrait conduire a une communication inadequate ou a un manquement de communication complete. A fin de profiter des etudes anterieures et en meme temps, de surmonter l’unilateralisme, la these propose un modele cognitif et pragmatique plus comprehensif pour les etudes en traduction, base sur une combinaison de pertinence et d’adaptation. Ce genre de modele considere la traduction comme de multiples interations dans les deux processus entre les trois parties qui ont de differentes cognitions et venant de differents milieux culturels. Pour prouver l’efficacite de ce modele, la these montre quelques preuves lingustiques authentiques receuillies lors des exercices de traduction en tant qu’exemples. Basee sur les preuves lingustiques et les illustrations, la these arrive a conclure que le traducteur, dont le travail consiste a prduire un texte en langue ciblee qui a une ressemblance pragmatique au texte en langue originale, devrait etre attentif aux problemes cognitifs et culturels quand il fait la traduction, car les environnements et les cultures differents peuvent exercer de diffentes influences sur les gens dans leur moyen d’utiliser et de comprendre la langue; le modele cognitif et pargmatique ainsi propose, en abordant les etudes en traduction d’une perspective cognitive et pragmatique et en mettant l’accent sur les analyses contextuelles, represente seulement une tentative de donner une orientation theorique unifiee pour les futures exercices en tradution. Mots-Cles: pragmatiques; cognition; pertinence; adaptation; les etudes en traduction
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".