Cardiolipin promotes polar localization of osmosensory transporter ProP in <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The osmolality required to activate osmosensory transporter ProP and the proportion of cardiolipin (CL) among the phospholipids of Escherichia coli rise with growth medium osmolality. Most CL synthesis has been attributed to the cls gene product. Transcription of cls increased with osmolality. The proportion of CL was low and osmolality-independent in cls(-) bacteria. It increased more dramatically on the transition to stationary phase in cls(-) than cls(+) bacteria. Thus, Cls is responsible for osmoregulated CL synthesis and other enzymes may contribute to CL accumulation during stationary phase. The proportion of phosphatidylglycerol (PG) was elevated and it increased with medium osmolality in cls(-) bacteria. A cls defect impaired growth of E. coli on solid and in liquid media at low and, more strongly, at high osmolality. Bacteria cultured at high osmolality without osmoprotectant were shorter and rounder than those cultured at low osmolality or with glycine betaine. Fluorescence microscopy showed that CL and ProP colocalize at the poles and near the septa of dividing E. coli cells. The polar localization of ProP was independent of its expression level but correlated with the proportion and polar localization of CL. Association with CL (and not PG) may be required for polar ProP localization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".