Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chinese character of “Ri”(“日” )is a typical pictographic character. Given the fact that it reflects natural objects, it is very easy for it to be noticed by ancient people in the beginning of the Chinese character formation. Therefore, the examination of the character of “Ri”(“日” ) is of great significance to the study of Chinese characters. In the meantime, by examining the close ties between the character of “Ri”(“日”) and the Chinese culture, we will be able to provide ways of thinking to understand the cultural and psychological dimension of Chinese characters. Keywords: the character of “Ri”(“日”), pictographic, characteristic culture Resume Le caractere « soleil » est un ideogramme typique. Comme il reflete la nature, les createurs des caracteres chinois de l’Antiquite penserent facilement a lui. Donc l’etude de ce caractere revetit une portee universelle pour la recherche du caractere chinois. En meme temps, l’investigation sur les liens etroits entre ce caractere et la culture contribue a comprehendre la formation de la psychologie culturelles des caracteres chinois. Mots-cles : « soleil », ideogramme, embleme special, culture 摘要 “日”字是一個典型的象形文字。因其反映自然之物，最容易進入漢字造字之初古人的視野，所以考察“日”字，對於研究漢文字，具有普遍性的意義，同時根據“日”字與文化之間密切聯繫的考察，為瞭解漢字的文化心理構成提供思路。 關鍵詞：“日”；象形；特徵；文化
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".