MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1919330201 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5836

INTEGRATING A SHORT SIMULATION PROJECT INTO AN INTRODUCTORY TRANSPORT PHENOMENA COURSE

2015· article· en· W1919330201 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jan B. Haelssig, Devin O’Malley

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie UniversityMcMaster University
KeywordsMultiphysicsComputer scienceProcess (computing)SoftwareCurriculumCourse (navigation)Transport phenomenaSoftware engineeringEngineering managementEngineeringFinite element methodProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transport phenomena is an integral part of many engineering curricula. Some programs, particularly in chemical engineering, teach transport phenomena in an integrated manner, but most teach heat, mass and momentum transfer in separate courses. Since powerful computers and software packages are now available to solve transport problems numerically, many current transport phenomena courses incorporate these tools for demonstration purposes. Many institutions also offer advanced level courses focusing on the use of this type of software, but the intuitive nature of modern software packages also permits the integration of these tools directly into introductory courses.This paper summarizes efforts made in the Department of Process Engineering and Applied Science at Dalhousie University to integrate one such tool, COMSOL Multiphysics, directly into the introductory transport phenomena course. In an introductory course, the time available to study software tools is inherently limited, and therefore it is necessary to introduce these topics as efficiently as possible. In our course, several hands-on tutorials are used to introduce students to COMSOL. We avoid focusing too much on numerical methods, error estimation techniques, or even detailed model validation techniques. Instead, these tutorials focus on using commercial software to solve transport problems and demonstrating good modeling practices. Near the end of the course, students are asked to complete a short modeling project. In the latest iteration, students were asked to reproduce a simulation in a recent journal publication, to expand on the results, and comment on the significance of their findings. The main challenges related to implementing such a project include selecting problems that do not have unreasonably high computational requirements, the increased workload for teaching assistants, the required level of expertise among teaching assistants, and the increased workload for students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207