MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1919427945 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1417222112

Rsu1 regulates ethanol consumption in <i>Drosophila</i> and humans

2015· article· en· W1919427945 on OpenAlexaff
Shamsideen A. Ojelade, Tianye Jia, Aylin R. Rodan, Julie L. Kadrmas, Anna Cattrell, Barbara Ruggeri, Pimphen Charoen, Hervé Lemaître, Tobias Banaschewski, Christian Büchel, Arun L.W. Bokde, Fabiana Carvalho, Patricia Conrod, Herta Flor, Vincent Frouin, Jürgen Gallinat, Hugh Garavan, Penny Gowland, Andreas Heinz, Mark Lathrop, Steven Lubbe, Jean‐Luc Martinot, Tomáš Paus, Michael N. Smolka, Rainer Spanagel, Paul F. O’Reilly, Jaana Laitinen, Juha Veijola, Jianfeng Feng, Sylvane Desrivières, Marjo‐Riitta Järvelin, Günter Schumann, Adrian Rothenfluh, Lisa Albrecht, Mercedes Arroyo, Éric Artiges, Semiha Aydın, Christine Bach, Alexis Barbot, Gareth J. Barker, Zuleima Bricaud, Uli Bromberg, Ruediger Bruehl, Katharina Czech, Jeffrey W. Dalley, Tahmine Fadai, Fanny Gollier Briand, Bert Heinrichs, Thomas Hübner, Albrecht Ihlenfeld, Alex Ing, Jennifer Jones, Eleanor Kennedy, Dirk Lanzerath, Claire Lawrence, Katharina Lüdemann, Christine Macare, Karl Mann, Adam C. Mar, Eva Mennigen, Fabiana Mesquita de Carvahlo, Kathrin Müller, Frauke Nees, Charlotte Nymberg, Marie-Laure Paillère, Zdenka Pausová, Jean‐Baptiste Poline, Luise Poustka, Erin Burke Quinlan, J.H. Reuter, Stephan Ripke, Trevor W. Robbins, Guillaume Robert, Sarah Rodehacke, Dirk Schmidt, Sophia Schneider, Wolfgang H. Sommer, Tade Matthias Spranger, Alicia Stedman, D.N. Stephens, Nicole Strache, Andreas Ströhle, Maren Struve, Naresh Subramaniam, Amir Tahmasebi, David Theobald, Nora C. Vetter, Hélène Vulser, Bernadeta Walaszek, Robert Whelan, Steven Williams, Bing Xu, Juliana Yacubian, Veronika Ziesch

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of General Medical SciencesMedical Research CouncilNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsMushroom bodiesBiologyEthanolCell biologyConditioned place preferenceActin cytoskeletonNeuroscienceCytoskeletonGeneticsDrosophila melanogasterBiochemistryGeneAddictionCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alcohol abuse is highly prevalent, but little is understood about the molecular causes. Here, we report that Ras suppressor 1 (Rsu1) affects ethanol consumption in flies and humans. Drosophila lacking Rsu1 show reduced sensitivity to ethanol-induced sedation. We show that Rsu1 is required in the adult nervous system for normal sensitivity and that it acts downstream of the integrin cell adhesion molecule and upstream of the Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) GTPase to regulate the actin cytoskeleton. In an ethanol preference assay, global loss of Rsu1 causes high naïve preference. In contrast, flies lacking Rsu1 only in the mushroom bodies of the brain show normal naïve preference but then fail to acquire ethanol preference like normal flies. Rsu1 is, thus, required in distinct neurons to modulate naïve and acquired ethanol preference. In humans, we find that polymorphisms in RSU1 are associated with brain activation in the ventral striatum during reward anticipation in adolescents and alcohol consumption in both adolescents and adults. Together, these data suggest a conserved role for integrin/Rsu1/Rac1/actin signaling in modulating reward-related phenotypes, including ethanol consumption, across phyla.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207