Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract At the outset of the 1970s, with the city ofNewYork deep in financial crisis, theBronx was the scene of violent conflict between rival gangs. In 1971, however, theSouthBronx gangs came together to sign a truce.AfrikaBambaataa, a young warlord from theBlackSpade gang, emerged as a peacemaker. In 1975 he created his own organization, theUniversalZuluNation, which brought together the four components of hip‐hop culture (DJing,MCing,Bboyingand graffiti).Bambaataa organized the first block parties, informal gatherings whereDJsillegally ran sound systems off the municipal power supply. The block parties catalysed theSouthBronx youth, for a time contributing to a more peaceful gang culture. Using the resistance paradigm, andCornelWest's substantial conception of cultural democracy, this essay questions whether hip‐hop engages and potentially challengesAmerican democracy in creating an autonomous space for putting citizenship into practice. The essay concludes by arguing firstly that hip‐hop can be seen as a hidden transcript emerging from places of exclusion, and secondly that its diffusion is inscribed in struggles for space in the city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".