Identification of 4‐coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL) substrate recognition domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL), the last enzyme of the general phenylpropanoid pathway, provides precursors for the biosynthesis of a large variety of plant natural products. 4 CL catalyzes the formation of CoA thiol esters of 4-coumarate and other hydroxycinnamates in a two step reaction involving the formation of an adenylate intermediate. 4 CL shares conserved peptide motifs with diverse adenylate-forming enzymes such as firefly luciferases, non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, and acyl:CoA synthetases. Amino acid residues involved in 4 CL catalytic activities have been identified, but domains involved in determining substrate specificity remain unknown. To address this question, we took advantage of the difference in substrate usage between the Arabidopsis thaliana 4 CL isoforms At4CL1 and At4CL2. While both enzymes convert 4-coumarate, only At4CL1 is also capable of converting ferulate. Employing a domain swapping approach, we identified two adjacent domains involved in substrate recognition. Both substrate binding domain I (sbd I) and sbd II of At4CL1 alone were sufficient to confer ferulate utilization ability upon chimeric proteins otherwise consisting of At4CL2 sequences. In contrast, sbd I and sbd II of At4CL2 together were required to abolish ferulate utilization in the context of At4CL1. Sbd I corresponds to a region previously identified as the substrate binding domain of the adenylation subunit of bacterial peptide synthetases, while sbd II centers on a conserved domain of so far unknown function in adenylate-forming enzymes (GEI/LxIxG). At4CL1 and At4CL2 differ in nine amino acids within sbd I and four within sbd II, suggesting that these play roles in substrate recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".