MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1920610025 · doi:10.1002/phar.1604

Pharmacokinetics of an Extended 4‐hour Infusion of Piperacillin‐Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

2015· article· en· W1920610025 on OpenAlexaffabout
Don‐Kelena Awissi, Annie Beauchamp, Élisabeth Hébert, Viviane Lavigne, Danya Lucia Munoz, Geneviève Lebrun, Michel Savoie, Mylène Fagnan, Julie Amyot, Nicolas Tétreault, Robert Robitaille, France Varin, Christian Lavallée, Vincent Pichette, Martine Leblanc

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPiperacillinMedicinePharmacokineticsTazobactamRenal replacement therapyPiperacillin/tazobactamInterquartile rangeDosingIntensive care unitLoading dosePharmacodynamicsAnesthesiaInternal medicinePseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of piperacillin-tazobactam administered as a 4-hour infusion in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). DESIGN: Prospective, observational, pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Montréal, Canada. PATIENTS: Twenty critically ill adults who were undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration and receiving a 4-hour infusion of piperacillin 4 g-tazobactam 0.5 g every 8 hours for a documented or suspected infection. INTERVENTION: Blood samples were collected every hour over an 8-hour dosing interval. Prefilter and postfilter blood samples, and effluent and urine samples were also collected. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved an unbound piperacillin plasma concentration above a target minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 64 mg/L (MIC that inhibits 90% of isolates for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) for at least 50% of the dosing interval; 18 (90%) of the 20 patients achieved this outcome. In all patients, the free piperacillin concentrations were above the Pseudomonas aeruginosa breakpoint of 16 mg/L for the entire time interval. Regarding piperacillin pharmacokinetic parameters, the median (interquartile range) minimum unbound plasma concentration was 65.15 mg/L (51.30-89.30), maximum unbound plasma concentration was 141.3 mg/L (116.75-173.90), sieving coefficient was 0.809 (0.738-0.938), total clearance was 65.82 ml/minute (53.79-102.87), and renal clearance was 0.16 ml/minute (0.05-3.04). The median CRRT dose was 32.0 ml/kg/h (25.0-39.8). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a 4-hour infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a favorable pharmacodynamic profile in patients undergoing CRRT. Concentrations associated with maximal activity were attained in our patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207