MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1920628767 · doi:10.70933/2773-9465.1433

A recent Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany

2011· article· en· W1920628767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pattarachai Kiratisin, Amornrut Leelaporn

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Medical Journal and Alternative Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTransgenic Plants and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutbreakEscherichia coliShiga toxinMicrobiologyShiga-like toxinPathogenBiologyToxinVirologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The outbreak of Escherichia coli in Germany and in other countries in Europe, including the USA and Canada, in May and June 2011, was apparently the biggest outbreak of food-borne infection. Several thousands of cases have been reported with a high number of deaths. The causative pathogenic organism is enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O104:H4. Raw bean sprouts grown in northern Germany were likely the reservoir of the pathogens. Genetic study has revealed an interesting information that the pathogen is a strain of enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) with an acquisition of Shiga toxin-encoding gene. Such toxin gene normally occurred in strains of EHEC. The presence of Shiga toxin could cause the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) leading to the fatal complication among EHEC-infected patients. Worthy of note is that in the current episode of outbreak showed numbers of patients with HUS and fatal ity much higher than in previous EHEC outbreaks. Therefore, further investigation is mandatory to conduct on its outbreak in order to obtain more information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Medical Journal and Alternative MedicineSame topicTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207