Caspase-3 Is a Component of Fas Death-Inducing Signaling Complex in Lipid Rafts and Its Activity Is Required for Complete Caspase-8 Activation during Fas-Mediated Cell Death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its discovery, caspase-8 has been placed at the apex of the proteolytic cascade triggered by death receptor (DR) cross-linking. Because of its capacity to interact with the cytoplasmic portion of DR, it has been suggested that caspase-8 acts independently of other caspases in the initiation of Fas and other DR signaling. In this study, we demonstrate that in Jurkat cells, caspase-3 cleavage is an early step during Fas-induced apoptosis. We show that caspase-3 processing into its p20 occurs rapidly after Fas cross-linking, in the absence of mitochondrial depolarization and caspase-9 activation. Moreover, caspase-3 is present in lipid rafts of untreated Jurkat cells and peripheral T lymphocytes. Caspase-3, caspase-8, and Fas-associated death domain are further recruited to lipid rafts of Jurkat cells following anti-Fas treatment. Fas immunoprecipitation reveals that caspase-3 is a component of the death-inducing signaling complex, suggesting that this cysteine protease is in close proximity to caspase-8. Furthermore, transduction of Jurkat cells with a caspase-3 dominant-negative form inhibits caspase-8 processing and results in inhibition of apoptosis, suggesting that caspase-3 activity is required for caspase-8 activation. Overall, these findings support a model whereby caspase-3 is a component of the death-inducing signaling complex located in lipid rafts, and as such, is involved in the amplification of caspase-8 activity by the mitochondrion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".