Part Time Students’ Benefit Perception on Online Shopping in Malaysia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Malaysia, studies on consumers’ benefit perception have been extensively examined. Results of the studies show that Malaysian consumers are still sceptical in this form of shopping due to factors linking to their preference in becoming recreational shoppers. These studies, however, examined this issue using consumers in general as their sample study. This study used a more specific sample group, namely, the part-time students, in examining consumers’ benefit perception on online shopping in Malaysia. Part-time students were chosen in this study as they represent the group of people whose time are highly occupied with working and studying. Therefore, they are likely to become convenience shoppers and may opt to shop online. The results show similar pattern to previous studies using other samples. The findings shed some lights to the marketing managers on the importance of the internet as a shopping medium to cater for people who are lacking luxury of time. Key words: Online shopping; part-time students; Malaysia, benefit perception Resume: En Malaisie, on a beaucoup etudie la preception des avantages des consommateurs. Les resultats de ces etudes montrent que les consommateurs malaisiens restent toujours sceptiques sur cette forme d’achat en raison des facteurs lies a leur preference d’etre des acheteurs de divertissement. Ces etudes, toutefois, ont examine ce sujet en utilisant les simples consommateurs en tant que leur echantillon d'etudes. Cet article a utilise un groupe de consommateurs plus specifique, a savoir les etudiants a temps partiel, pour examiner la perception des avantages de l’achat en ligne des consommateurs en Malaisie. Les etudiants a temps partiel ont ete choisis dans cette etude car ils representent le groupe de personnes tres occupees par le travail et les etudes. Par consequent, ils pourraient probablement devenir des acheteurs qui preferent la commodite et opter pour l’achat en ligne. Cette etude montre des resultats similaires a ceux des etudes precedentes utilisant d'autres echantillons. Ces decouvertes permettent de mettre en lumiere l'importance de l'Internet comme un moyen d'achats pour les managers de marketing, a fin qu’ils puissent penser a mieux repondre aux besoins des personnes pour qui le temps est un luxe. Mots-Cles: achat en ligne; etudiants a temps partiel; Malaisie; perception des avantages
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".