On interfacial instability as a cause of transverse subcritical bed forms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent experimental results suggest there are at least two distinct bed form initiation processes. Bed forms may be generated from local bed defects that are propagated down and across stream by flow separation processes when sediment transport is patchy and sporadic. Alternatively, bed form development may occur over the whole bed at once when sediment transport is general and widespread. Herein, we critically test a simple model for this latter bed form initiation mode that was originally presented by H.‐K. Liu in 1957 but not tested because of the complex nature of the measurements required. The theory is based on the idea that a moving sand bed might be likened to a dense fluid and that a hydrodynamic instability develops at the interface between the sediment transport layer and the near‐bed fluid, leading to the organization of the transport system into laterally extended, discrete bed forms. Our predicted initial bed form lengths are within 10% of the lengths observed in a series of flume experiments, suggesting that transverse waveforms on sand beds sheared by unidirectional currents can be initiated as an interfacial hydrodynamic instability of Kelvin‐Helmholtz type when the current is sufficiently vigorous to produce general sediment movement, that is, to create a sediment transport layer that acts as a pseudofluid with density composed of solid and fluid components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".