Prosocial Behavior Motivation of Acheness Volunteers in Helping Tsunami Disaster Victims
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explore pro-social behavior motivation of Acheness volunteers, who performed humanitarian activities in helping Tsunami victims in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, Indonesia. The research was carried out from July 2005 to February 2006. Data were collected from 147 university students in Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar (86 males and 91 females) using two types of questionnaires: (1) Movitavion of Prosocial Behavior Index (MPBI) and Type of Prosocial Behavior Questionnaires (TPBQ), (2) Demographic characteristics for control data, survey and interview. Data were analyzed descriptively and statistical analysis (hypothesis testing) were done using Stepwise Multiple Regression procedure under SPSS/PC Ver.10.00. Results indicated that Pro-social Behavior Motivation of Acheness Volunteers in helping Tsunami victims in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam is Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis. Based on statistical analysis on 3 models of Pro-social Behavior Motivation (Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis, Negative State Relief Hypothesis and Empathic Joy Hypothesis) with demographic characteristics of respondents (age, educational background, domicile and sex) only motivation of Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis and sex are significantly correlated with pro-social behavior of Acheness volunteers in humanitarian activities and helping Tsunami victims. The respective R-square is 0.059 and 0.137, result of coefficient are 0.521 and 7.830. The dominant types of pro-social behavior of Acheness volunteers in this study are giving and sharing. They helped tsunami victims by psychosocial, counseling, story reading, games, discussion, and charity distributions. Keywords: Prosocial Behavior; Aceh Volunteers; Tsunami victims Resume: Le but de cette recherche est d'etudier le comportement pro-social des benevoles de l’Acheness, qui ont effectue des activites humanitaires pour aider les victimes du tsunami dans la province de Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, en Indonesie. La recherche a ete realisee a partir de Juillet 2005 a Fevrier 2006. Les donnees ont ete recueillies aupres de 147 etudiants universitaires de Banda Aceh et Aceh Besar (86 garcons et 91 filles) en utilisant deux types de questionnaires: (1) Indice de movitavion de comportement prosocial (MPBI) et le type de questionnaires sur le comportement prosocial (TPBQ), (2) Les caracteristiques demographiques pour le controle de donnees, d'enquete et d'entrevue. Les donnees ont ete analysees descriptive et l'analyse statistique (test d'hypothese) a ete faite en utilisant la procedure de regression multiple et progressive de SPSS / PC Ver.10.00. Les resultats indiquent que la motivation du comportement pro-social des benevoles de l’Acheness pour aider les victimes du tsunami dans la province de Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam est l’hypothese de l'empathie-altruisme. Sur la base de l'analyse statistique sur les 3 modeles de la motivation de comportement pro-social (hypothese de l'empathie-altruisme, hypothese de secours negatif de l’Etat et hypothese de joie empathique) et selon les caracteristiques demographiques des personnes questionnees (âge, niveau d’education, le domicile et le sexe) , on a decouvert que seulement la motivation de l’hypothese de l'empathie-altruisme et le sexe sont significativement correlees avec le comportement pro-social des benevoles de l’Acheness dans les activites humanitaires et l'aide aux victimes du tsunami. Les R-carre est de 0,059 et 0,137 respectivement, et le resultat du coefficient sont de 0.521 et 7.830. Les principaux types de comportement pro-social des volontaires del’Acheness dans cette etude sont de donner et de partager. Ils ont aide les victimes du tsunami par la psychologie sociale, des conseils, la lecture, des jeux, de la discussion et de distributions de la charite. Mots-Cles: comportement pro-social; benevoles; Aceh; victime du Tsunami
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".