MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1922784450

ELUCIDATING THE INTERACTIONS OF THE GOLGI ASSOCIATED RETROGRADE PROTEIN (GARP) COMPLEX IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA.

2015· dissertation· en· W1922784450 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ryan Moedt

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsArabidopsis thalianaGolgi apparatusBiologyArabidopsisComputational biologyCell biologyBiochemistryGeneMutant
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants contain a diversified endomembrane system and transport within the network requires efficient and accurate vesicle transport. Tethering factors represent a group of loosely related proteins and protein complexes that act to physically link vesicles to the target membrane. UNH was previously identified as the VPS51 homolog of the Golgi-associated retrograde protein (GARP) complex, known to tether vesicles in endosome to trans-golgi network (TGN) retrograde transport. The unh cellular phenotype is similar to secretion/vacuole defects observed in yeast and metazoan GARP complex mutants suggesting a conserved function in plants. This study was designed to assess whether the Arabidopsis GARP complex members participate in similar protein interactions as found in other eukaryotes. All of the plant GARP subunits contain predicted N-terminal coiled coils, important for interaction in other organisms. We show through deletional mutagenesis that these predicted N-terminal coiled coils are required for UNH to interact with VPS52 in vivo via yeast two-hybrid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)Same topicBotanical Research and ChemistryFrench-language works237,207