Regards portés sur la collection de photographies d’Indiens chumash de Léon de Cessac : entre pratique anthropologique et phénomène historique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au e sicle, alors qu'ils entament l'tude des populations amrindiennes situes l'ouest du Mississippi, les scientifiques amricains voient leur pratique de collecte de donnes anthropologiques facilite par le dveloppement et la simplification de la photographie. Ce nouveau support est peru comme un tmoignage authentique, bien plus prcis que les descriptions crites souvent subjectives. l'inverse de ces dernires, la photographie ne saurait mentir. Certaines rgions des tats-Unis sont cependant moins concernes que d'autres par cette campagne de photographies anthropologiques. C'est notamment le cas de la Californie, et rares sont les clichs pris cette poque reprsentant les populations amrindiennes de cette rgion. Les seules photographies que nous connaissons des Chumash, tribu amrindienne tablie au sud de la cte californienne, entre San Luis Obispo et Los Angeles, sont celles de Lon de Cessac (31 juillet 1841-14 fvrier 1891), explorateur franais qui se rendit en Californie la fin des annes 1870 (Galliard 2014). Ces clichs, conservs l'iconothque du muse du quai Branly et considrs comme des tmoins historiques de la culture chumash, ont pourtant t totalement reconstitus en studio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".