MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A rapid method for the isolation of untouched naive CD8 T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (46.9)

2011· article· en· W192314534 on OpenAlexaff
Karina L. McQueen, Vesna Posarac, Maureen Fairhurst, Terry E. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsStemcell Technologies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD8Cytotoxic T cellPeripheral blood mononuclear cellFlow cytometryMolecular biologyT cellBiologyAntigenAntigen-presenting cellChemistryImmunologyImmune systemIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Naïve CD8 T cells are, by definition, those that have been released by the thymus into circulation, but have not yet encountered their cognate antigens. Once they become activated they proliferate and generate effector T cells. We describe an easy and rapid method for the isolation of untouched naïve CD8 T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Briefly, PBMCs are isolated by Ficoll-Paque PLUS density gradient sedimentation. Naïve CD8 T cells are then enriched using immunomagnetic, column-free, negative selection (EasySep™). Using EasySep™, unwanted cells are removed using antibody complexes recognizing non-naïve CD8 T cells and dextran-coated magnetic particles. Labeled cells are separated by placing the tube in an EasySep™ magnet. This procedure can be fully automated using RoboSep™. EasySep™ isolated naïve CD8 T cells are assessed by flow cytometry using a combination of antibodies specific for naïve, effector and memory cells. Naïve CD8 T cells are defined as CD8+CD45RA+CCR7+ and CD45RO-CD56-CD57-. Starting with PBMCs isolated from fresh blood and buffy coat, purities of 89±3% (n=8) are obtained (starting cell frequency 1.0-11.2%). EasySep™ isolated naïve CD8 T cells undergo robust proliferation as measured by flow cytometry of CFSE-labeled cells in culture with CD3/28 T cell expander beads. This simple method to isolate naïve CD8 T cells will be invaluable to researchers studying T cell differentiation, autoimmunity and infectious diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→