MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Does Blockade of the Renin Angiotensin System Affect Sympathetic and Blood Pressure Responses to Amlodipine in Young Hypertensive Patients?<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn1"><sup>*</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn2"><sup>†</sup></xref><subtitle />

2007· article· en· W1923425089 on OpenAlexaff
Marcel Ruzicka, Elizabeth Coletta, Frans H. H. Leenen

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hypertension · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuinaprilAmlodipineMedicineBlood pressureInternal medicineDiscontinuationPlaceboAngiotensin IIEndocrinologyAngiotensin-converting enzymeACE inhibitor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II-mediated increases in sympathetic activity may contribute to smaller blood-pressure decreases in response to dihydropyridines in young versus older hypertensive patients. We evaluated whether quinapril unmasks angiotensin II-dependent sympathetic activity on amlodipine. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, clinical trial, young mild hypertensives were randomized to quinapril for 1 week (study 1), followed by quinapril + amlodipine for 6 weeks (study 2), followed by amlodipine + placebo for 6 weeks (study 3), or else were randomized to placebo for 1 week (study 1), followed by placebo + amlodipine for 6 weeks (study 2), followed by amlodipine + quinapril for 6 weeks (study 3). Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and plasma hormones were analyzed at the end of each treatment period. Twenty-one subjects completed this study. RESULTS: Quinapril alone decreased BP by 8 +/- 3/6 +/- 3 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg, and amlodipine alone decreased BP by 6 +/- 3/4 +/- 2 (mean +/- SD). Quinapril combined with amlodipine caused a drop of 13 +/- 3/13 +/- 3 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg in one group, and 14 +/- 3/14 +/- 2 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg in the second group. Six weeks after discontinuation of quinapril, amlodipine alone caused no change (0 +/- 3/-2 +/- 3) (mean +/- SD). The MSNA decreased by 3 bursts/100 heartbeats at visits 2 v 1 and 3 v 2 (P = .02 for time effect), regardless of treatment. Angiotensin II showed small increases with each visit in the first group, and small decreases in the second group (P = .02 for treatment effect). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that amlodipine does not activate the renin-angiotensin system to counteract its BP-lowering effect in young hypertensives. Similarly, no angiotensin II-dependent component in MSNA appears to be present at baseline or to be induced by amlodipine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of HypertensionSame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207