Does Blockade of the Renin Angiotensin System Affect Sympathetic and Blood Pressure Responses to Amlodipine in Young Hypertensive Patients?<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn1"><sup>*</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn2"><sup>†</sup></xref><subtitle />
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II-mediated increases in sympathetic activity may contribute to smaller blood-pressure decreases in response to dihydropyridines in young versus older hypertensive patients. We evaluated whether quinapril unmasks angiotensin II-dependent sympathetic activity on amlodipine. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, clinical trial, young mild hypertensives were randomized to quinapril for 1 week (study 1), followed by quinapril + amlodipine for 6 weeks (study 2), followed by amlodipine + placebo for 6 weeks (study 3), or else were randomized to placebo for 1 week (study 1), followed by placebo + amlodipine for 6 weeks (study 2), followed by amlodipine + quinapril for 6 weeks (study 3). Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and plasma hormones were analyzed at the end of each treatment period. Twenty-one subjects completed this study. RESULTS: Quinapril alone decreased BP by 8 +/- 3/6 +/- 3 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg, and amlodipine alone decreased BP by 6 +/- 3/4 +/- 2 (mean +/- SD). Quinapril combined with amlodipine caused a drop of 13 +/- 3/13 +/- 3 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg in one group, and 14 +/- 3/14 +/- 2 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg in the second group. Six weeks after discontinuation of quinapril, amlodipine alone caused no change (0 +/- 3/-2 +/- 3) (mean +/- SD). The MSNA decreased by 3 bursts/100 heartbeats at visits 2 v 1 and 3 v 2 (P = .02 for time effect), regardless of treatment. Angiotensin II showed small increases with each visit in the first group, and small decreases in the second group (P = .02 for treatment effect). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that amlodipine does not activate the renin-angiotensin system to counteract its BP-lowering effect in young hypertensives. Similarly, no angiotensin II-dependent component in MSNA appears to be present at baseline or to be induced by amlodipine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".