MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1923544175 · doi:10.29173/cjs7635

Didier Fassin and Richard Rechtman, The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood

2010· article· en· W1923544175 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joseph E. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireSociologyPsychoanalysisCriminologyEpistemologyPsychologyPhilosophyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O ver the past several decades, the concept of trauma has emerged as a powerful and ubiquitous model for expressing the painful memories and other suffering that arises from exposure to stressful events.As a clinical term, trauma has taken canonical form as the event that gives rise to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Originally, PTSD was conceived as a psychological reaction to horrifying, usually life-threatening experiences, including combat, rape, and life in a concentration camp.Since then, the events deemed capable of producing PTSD have multiplied many times over to include a much wider range of negative incidents.Another notion of trauma, now widely deployed in the media and everyday speech, by rights groups and humanitarian organizations, works by analogy with, but is broader than, the psychiatric concept.In this popular usage, traumas are large-scale tragic events -natural disasters, terrorist attacks, genocide, political repression, and so on -whose effects are viewed not as psychiatric disorders but as wounds in the individual psyche or collective memory of specific groups and peoples.Trauma in this broader sense is a metaphor for collective suffering, a means of representing the past and painful experience as testimony and as grounds for recognition and reparation of victims.An immense literature has been produced on trauma, much of it in the mental health field.Few studies, to my knowledge, explore the psychiatric and the metaphorical meanings in the same study; rarer yet are these notions of trauma investigated by qualitative fieldwork in multiple organizational contexts.That is the extraordinary accomplishment of The Empire of Trauma.Originally published in French in 2007, the book is a powerful social history of the ascendency of trauma as a universalizing moral category, its deployment as a signifier for many different experiences of violence and victimization, and its role as a resource for claiming rights, bearing witness, and authenticating injury.Drawing on research in three cases "emblematic of the contemporary politics of trauma," the authors, both physician-anthropologists, ask probing ques-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsFrench-language works237,207