MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1924289691 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4475

Reduction of Runx1 Transcription Factor Activity Up-Regulates Fas and Bim Expression and Enhances the Apoptotic Sensitivity of Double Positive Thymocytes

2005· article· en· W1924289691 on OpenAlexaff
Natsumi Abe, Kazuyoshi Kohu, Hidetaka Ohmori, Keitaro Hayashi, Toshio Watanabe, Katsuto Hozumi, Takehito Sato, Sonoko Habu, Masanobu Satake

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsT-cell receptorRUNX1ApoptosisTranscription factorThymocyteTransgeneCell biologyBiologyCD3EndogenyMolecular biologyReceptorGenetically modified mouseChemistryT cellImmunologyCD8EndocrinologyBiochemistryAntigenGeneImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The death or survival of double positive (DP) thymocytes is determined by the strength of their TCR signaling. Of the three Runx family proteins, the DP cells only express the Runx1 transcription factor. We introduced and expressed in murine thymocytes the Runt domain of Runx1, which antagonizes the activity of endogenous Runx1. The Runt transgenic DP thymocytes expressed higher levels of the proapoptotic molecules Fas and Bim compared with the wild-type cells. Furthermore, the Runt transgenic cells were more susceptible to apoptosis induced by the artificial cross-linking of the TCR by the anti-CD3 Ab. This susceptibility was partially abrogated by the lpr/lpr background. In addition, Runx1:HY-TCR-double transgenic DP thymocytes were resistant to the apoptosis induced by the endogenously presented HY Ag. We propose that Runx1 functions to suppress the apoptotic sensitivity of DP thymocytes in the context of TCR signaling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207