The use of the new ReFacto AF Laboratory Standard allows reliable measurement of FVIII:C levels in ReFacto AF mock plasma samples by a one‐stage clotting assay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Factor VIII coagulant (FVIII:C) levels measured in patients receiving ReFacto® (B-domain-deleted recombinant FVIII) using chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) and one-stage clotting assay (OSA) have frequently shown discrepancies, and the use of the ReFacto Laboratory Standard (RLS) has therefore been recommended to minimize these differences. The potency of ReFacto AF®, the albumin-free successor of ReFacto®, is determined using CSA for the titration of vials, and a new standard (RLS-AF) was developed to measure its biological efficacy using OSA. This multicentre study therefore evaluated the efficacy of this new RLS in minimizing differences between OSA and CSA when measuring FVIII:C levels in plasma. Mock plasma samples were prepared by diluting ReFacto AF® in FVIII-deficient plasma to obtain four concentrations ranging from 15 to 90 IU dL⁻¹ . FVIII:C levels were then measured in six laboratories on four separate days using three different procedures, i.e. OSA with a plasma standard (PS) as reference, OSA with RLS-AF and CSA with PS. The inter-centre standard deviation ranged from 1.4 to 5.5 IU dL⁻¹. However, FVIII:C levels measured with OSA were closer to the expected values when RLS-AF was used. In addition, the uncertainty of measurement, reflecting the inter-method discrepancy was greatly reduced when RLS-AF was employed in OSA (15%) in place of PS (33%). This study demonstrates that the OSA performed with RLS-AF to establish calibration curves provides a valuable alternative to CSA to measure FVIII:C in ReFacto-AF-treated patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".