Pulsed electrical stimulation modulates fibroblasts' behaviour through the Smad signalling pathway
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the healing characteristics and the underlying signalling pathway of human dermal fibroblasts under the influence of pulsed electrical stimulation (PES). Primary human dermal fibroblasts were seeded on polypyrrole-coated polyester fabrics and subjected to four different PES protocols. The parameters of the rectangular pulse included potential intensity (50 and 100 mV/mm) and stimulation time (pulse width 300 s within a period of 600 s, and pulse width 10 s within a period of 1200 s). Our study revealed that PES moderately improved the ability of the cells to migrate in association with a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase of FGF2 secretion by the PES-exposed fibroblasts. These exposed fibroblasts were able to contract collagen gel matrix up to 48 h and this collagen gel contraction paralleled an increase in α-SMA mRNA expression and protein production from the PES-exposed fibroblasts. Interestingly, the effect of PES on the human fibroblasts involved the Smad signalling pathway, as we observed higher levels of phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 in the stimulated groups compared to the control groups. Overall, this study demonstrated that PES modulates fibroblast activities through the Smad signalling pathway, thus providing new mechanistic insights related to the use of PES to promote wound healing in humans. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it