MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1925737747 · doi:10.25501/soas.00020324

The love of liberty divided us here? : factors leading to the introduction and postponement in passage of Liberia's Dual Citizenship Bill

2021· dissertation· en· W1925737747 on OpenAlex
Robtel Neajai Pailey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreMo Ibrahim Foundation
KeywordsPostponementCitizenshipDual (grammatical number)Political scienceLawEngineeringArtOperations managementLiteraturePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Having never been formally colonised and more recently emerging from 14 years of intermittent armed conflict, Liberia represents a stark case study in citizenship construction because of its idiosyncratic history of black settler state formation.Because 'Liberian citizenship' has historically been a tool of exclusion-once barring women, non--settlers, non--Christians, and non--blacks-it remains a violently contested space of inquiry with newer forms of citizenship now developing in Liberia and within transnational spaces.In this thesis, I argue that conflict, migration, globalisation and post--war recovery have configured and reconfigured 'Liberian citizenship' across space and time, thereby influencing the introduction and postponement in passage of a dual citizenship bill proposed in 2008. 1 The bill is used as a point of entry to evaluate Liberia's long--standing struggle to construct a unique brand of citizenship that is totalising, tactical and timeless.My findings show that contemporary constructions of 'Liberian citizenship' transcend the legal definition enshrined in the country's Aliens and Nationality Law-moving from passive, identity--based citizenship to more active, practice-based citizenship.Thus, claims for and counter--claims against dual citizenship are manifestations of the hybridity of citizenship (identity + practice).Using actor-oriented analysis as my theoretical framework, I examine the interfaces between 202 Liberian interviewees-namely, homeland Liberians in Monrovia; Liberian diasporas in London, Washington, Freetown, and Accra; permanent and circular returnees; executive and legislative members of government, including the four sponsors of the proposed dual citizenship bill-showing that their conceptualisations of 'Liberian citizenship' differ according to their lived experiences and social locations, and ultimately influence participation, or lack thereof, in post--war recovery.Given the dynamic trends in citizenship configuration across the globe and particularly in Africa, my findings fill gaps in the growing body of literature on citizenship and participation in emigrant--sending countries.The thesis further contributes to debates about how to rebuild states whose wars were fuelled by the politicisation of identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it