MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1925904764 · doi:10.1002/ghg.1372

A comparison of water chemistry from a CO<sub>2</sub>‐enhanced oil recovery project with reactive transport modeling of CO<sub>2</sub> injection into a carbonate reservoir

2013· article· en· W1925904764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreenhouse Gases Science and Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonateCaprockSupercritical fluidGeochemical modelingSaturation (graph theory)Enhanced oil recoveryPlumeSolubilityChemistryPetroleum reservoirMineralogyProduced waterPetroleum engineeringGeologyDissolutionThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A long‐term geochemical monitoring program was conducted at a CO 2 ‐enhanced oil recovery site in central Alberta (Canada) to examine geological storage of CO 2 . The program included geochemical monitoring of reservoir brines, a mineralogical study, and using TOUGHREACT to compare model and field observations. CO 2 was injected into a highly permeable carbonate reservoir at 78 tonnes/day for 2.5 years. Fluid and gas samples were obtained for geochemical characterization before, during, and 1.4 years after injection from a production well ∼915 m from the injection well at a depth of ∼936 m. Downhole water compositions were calculated using SOLMINEQ88 and compared to predictions from TOUGHREACT. Following CO 2 breakthrough after ∼23 months, downhole pH decreased, HCO 3 − ; and calcium concentrations increased, while magnesium concentrations changed marginally, indicating solubility and ionic trapping were occurring simultaneously. Trends in analyzed and modeled species were similar, but concentration levels were different. Calibrating the model to achieve better correlation between results was attempted but proved unsuccessful. The variances were likely caused by differences between ideal and reservoir mineral's kinetic parameters, surface area, thermodynamic parameters and sampling technique. Five‐hundred‐year simulations showed the CO 2 plume migrating vertically due to capillary forces with no significant change in gas saturation below the caprock over the post‐injection period. The majority of CO 2 remained trapped as a supercritical phase as the reservoir is composed of only carbonate minerals. The low reactivity of the reservoir is positive, in that the reservoir is not negatively impacted by dissolution and negative in that no mineral trapping occurs. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it