Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to set up the theoretical system of the multiculturalism which functioned as a theory of national integration, cultural education, and coexistent system. The conflicts between communities such as national-states, ethnic groups, civil communities, and corporate communities, which often occurred in the modern society. In the process of the modernization and economic growth, multiculturialism appeared as the strategy to resolve the social conflicts in Canada, Australia, and Western countries. But the system of multiculturalism is confusing by its various meanings and situations. As a consequence, the multiculturalism consisted of the liberal pluralist approach, the corporate pluralist approach, the radical pluralist approach, the ethnic federalism pluralist approach, and the secessionist / separationist pluralist approach. Its goals are facts that resolve the divergence between minority and majority, correctly recognize difference between the core society and the periphery society, ultimately remove discrimination in the political and economic spheres. The policies of the multiculturalism included multiculturalization, multiinstitutionalization, multisocialization, and multiequalization. To support common equality in modern society, the multiculturalism must be practiced in the cultural stage as well as the social, economic, and political stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".