Legal Consideration of Recognizing Dual Nationality in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, China adopts the principle of non-recognition of dual nationality. However, with the continuous development of society, and increasingly frequent international cooperation and exchanges, Chinese emigrants abroad are crying for state to recognize dual nationality system. And also, the issue of dual nationality has triggered a fierce debate in China. Under new situation in China, limited or targeted recognizing dual nationality meets the requirements of the law and applies theory to practice. China should make appropriate adaptations to the nationality policy so as to meet the demands of current economic and social development better. Key words : Dual nationality; Nationality law; Reciprocal principle; Overseas Chinese Resume Actuellement, la loi de la naturalisation n’approuve pas la double nationalites. Cependant, avec le developpement sans cesse de notre societe, l’augmentation de jour en jour de la collaboration et l’echange de la communication avec l’international, La demande des immigrants qui sont des chinois d’origine pour la reforme d’approuvement de la Double nationalites ne cesse de se croitre, le sujet de la Double Nationalite, ce sujet de la Double nationalite a egalement entrainer des discussions animees. La Chine sous la nouvelle forme, l’approuvement de la double nationalites est limite ou visee, mais ce dernier est conforme aux exigences judicaires et l’application de la pratique. La Chine devrait adjuster un peu ses reformes, afin de mieux s’adapter aux besoins de l’ere du developpement de la societe et de l’economie d’actelle. Mots cles : D o u b l e n a t i o n a l i t e s ; L o i d e l a naturalisation; Principe egale; Chinois d’etranger
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".