MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1927029926 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2015.007005

Delay-encoded transmission and image reconstruction method in synthetic transmit aperture imaging

2015· article· en· W1927029926 on OpenAlexafffund
Ping Gong, Michael C. Kolios, Yuan Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIterative reconstructionSynthetic aperture radarTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceComputer visionOpticsElectronic engineeringAcousticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic transmit aperture (STA) imaging systems usually have a lower SNR compared with conventional Bmode ultrasound systems because only one or a small number of elements are selected for each transmission in STA. Here we propose delay-encoded synthetic transmit aperture (DE-STA) imaging to encode all the transmission elements to increase the SNR of the pre-beamformed RF signals. The encoding scheme is similar to the Hadamard encoding. However, in each transmission of DE-STA imaging, selected transmitting elements are delayed by a half period of the ultrasound wave relative to the rest transmitting elements, rather than using a pulse inversion as in the Hadamard encoding sequence. After all the transmission events, a decoding process in the temporal frequency domain is applied to the acquired RF signals to recover the equivalent traditional STA signals with a better SNR. The proposed protocol is tested with simulated data (using Field II) and experimental data acquired with a commercial linear array imaging system (Ultrasonix RP). The results from both the simulations and the experiments demonstrate increased SNR of pre-beamformed RF signals and improved image quality in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio compared with traditional STA. The lateral resolution (as assessed by a wire target) of DESTA imaging is improved by 28% and the PSNR of the wire is increased by 7 dB, respectively, compared with traditional STA imaging. The proposed image reconstruction framework can also be extended to other transmission protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207