MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1927069382

비만 클리닉을 내원한 여성의 체질량 지수, 감정 불능증, 대처 방안 및 자아 존중감의 상관관계

2001· article· ko· W1927069382 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue생물치료정신의학 · 2001
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaToronto Alexithymia ScaleObesityCoping (psychology)Clinical psychologyBody mass indexPsychologyNormal weightMedicineOverweightInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives : Obesity which causing many physical and psychological problems is difficult to treatment. Although many researches have found that genetic factor is the key factor of obesity, there is a few research about the environment of representing the genetic type or the role of life attitude. The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships between Body Mass Index(BMI hereafter), alexithymia, coping scale and self-esteem of women in obesity clinic to set up the method of preventing obesity. Methods : One hundred seven women, aged 19 through 40 years who were in treatments at G obesity clinic in Seoul and Ajou university hospital were surveyed by a questionnaire which was designed for this research. In addition the Korean version of the alexithymia, coping scale, self esteem scale. And then the height and weight of those children were measured and the BMI was calculated, Results : 1) There is no significant difference between abnormal and normal weight group about the factor Ⅰ, factor Ⅱ and factor Ⅲ of alexithymia scale. 2) The results of coping scale show that the value of active-cognitive coping scale score is significantly higher in normal weight group relative to abnormal weight group(p<0.05). The scores of avoidance coping is significantly higher in abnormal weight group relative to normal weight group(p<0.05). Although there is no significant difference between abnormal and normal weight group about the score of active-behavioral coping scale, normal weight group shows higher tendency. 3) The result of self-esteem scale shows that the score of self-esteem is significantly higher in abnormal weight group relative to normal weight group(p<0.05). Conclusion : We can conclude that alexithymia may be the reason for a subgroup of obesity women and the women who take avoidance, inactive cognitive and behavioral coping can be obese in high possibility. Also normal weight women who visited obesity clinic shows low self-esteem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it