A Study on the Concept of Mental Health and its Implication for Social Work Education in the Context of Chinese Communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recently rapid growth of practice in cross-culture and multi-culture field leads practitioners to facing challenge of having to make choice amid different cultural values. Chinese culture has its own framework in understanding the concept of mental health, which is quite different from the Western’s. On personal level, Chinese culture centers on the individual’s inner cultivation. On self level, it concerns much about the individual’s moral practice. On societal level, it focuses on the social harmony. And on spiritual level, it emphasizes on transcending the life limitations to reach oneness. Therefore, it is necessary for social work educators to help studnts to understand the basic cultural meanings underlying the concept of mental healh when applying it to the context of Chinese communities. Keywords: mental health; Chinese culture; progressive adaptation; limitation inclusionResume: La croissance rapide de la pratique dans un contexte inter-culturel et multi-culturel conduit les praticiens a faire face au defi de faire un choix parmi de differentes valeurs culturelles. La culture chinoise a sa propre comprehension de la notion de sante mentale, ce qui est assez differente de celle de l'Occident . Au niveau personnel, la culture chinoise se concentre sur la cultivation interne de l'individu. Au niveau individuel, il s'agit bien de la pratique morale de l'individu. Au niveau communautairel, elle souligne l'harmonie sociale. Et au spirituel, elle met l'accent sur la transcendance des limites de vie pour atteindre l'unite. Par consequent, il est necessaire que les educateurs sociaux aident les etudiants a comprendre les significations culturelles de base propres au concept de sante mentale lors de l'appliquer dans le contexte des communautes chinoises.Mots-cles: sante mentale; culture chinoise; adaptation progressive; inclusion de prescription
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".