MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Local Government and Poverty Eradication in Rural Nigeria LE GOUVERNEMENT LOCAL ET L'ÉRADICATION DE LA PAUVRETÉ RURALE AU NIGERIA

2010· article· fr· W1927621376 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jonathan A. Aderonmu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyNigeriansPopulationPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)Independence (probability theory)Rural areaHumanitiesEconomic growthDevelopment economicsSociologyEconomicsDemographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poverty is a universal phenomenon that cut across both developed and underdeveloped countries. In Nigeria poverty is deep, widespread and multidimensional, and Nigerians are all victims of this condition in one way or the other even though the degree differs. However, available statistics reveals that poverty is more pronounced among the rural dwellers that form 70% of the country’s population. Efforts by successive government to eradicate poverty especially in the rural areas since independence have not yielded any desirable result in spite of huge amount of resources committed to it. This article focuses on the causes of rural poverty as well as strategies adopted to eradicate it made by successive regimes in Nigeria. It also analysis some of the main weaknesses of the past attempt aimed at eradicating poverty and highlights the potential role that local government can play in poverty eradication efforts. Keywords: Poverty; Causes of Poverty; Local Government; Rural Areas and Poverty Alleviation Programmes Resume: La pauvrete est un phenomene universel dans les pays developpes et sous-developpes. Au Nigeria, la pauvrete est profonde, generalisee et multidimensionnelle, et les Nigerians sont touts les victimes de cette condition dans un sens ou dans l'autre, meme si le degre differe. Cependant, les statistiques disponibles revelent que la pauvrete est plus prononcee chez les habitants des zones rurales qui constituent 70% de la population du pays. Les efforts deployes par les gouvernements successifs pour eradiquer la pauvrete, en particulier dans les zones rurales depuis l'independance, n'ont pas donne de resultat souhaitable, en depit des enormes ressources engagees. Cet article se concentre sur les causes de la pauvrete rurale ainsi que les strategies adoptees par les regimes successifs au Nigeria pour l'eradiquer. Il analyse egalement certaines des faiblesses principales de la derniere tentative visant a eradiquer la pauvrete et met en evidence le role potentiel que les gouvernements locaux peuvent jouer dans les efforts d'eradication de la pauvrete.Mots-cles: pauvrete; causes de la pauvrete; gouvernements locaux; zones rurales et programmes de lutte contre la pauvrete

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicSocioeconomics of Resources and ConservationFrench-language works237,207